![]() He says that crucifixion or hanging should create a distinct blood imprint but the shroud did not.Īnd this isn't the first time the authenticity of the shroud has been questioned. He's clearly unsatisfied with how these supposed post-mortem stains at the back defy logic. That's not what you’d expect from a crucified man, laid supine post-mortem. “The short, rivulet-like stains align with a standing person whose arms are angled at roughly 45 degrees.” But wait, there’s more! The frontal lance wound stain seems to be bleeding in a manner consistent with a standing person. ![]() “Look at the back of the left hand,” they point out. Their study minutely dissects the trajectory of these sanguine droplets. Instead of originating from a body positioned horizontally (as one would expect from a crucifixion), the blood appears to have dripped from above. The blood stains? They don't match the story we've been told. You see, what they discovered throws a wrench in the age-old belief system. Fasten your seat belts their findings are a bit of a wild ride. Their mission? To ascertain if the blood patterns on this cloth could indeed belong to someone executed on a cross-be it T-shaped or Y-shaped. Matteo Borrini and his band of forensic experts from John Moores University, Liverpool. But wait, is it all but a lie? Recent revelations tilt the scales towards doubt.Įnter Dr. A linen cloth bearing the faint imprint of a man's face and body, believed for generations to have cradled the crucified body of Jesus Christ. The Shroud of Turin! The object of eternal fascination, reverence, and now, skepticism. The blood spatter is not consistent with someone who has been crucified Photo by GETTY
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |